"I think I'm above average." It is some of the most common lingo we use to assess ourselves. In fact:
- Over 90% of cancer patients think they are in better health than the average cancer patient
- Over 90% of students think they are smarter than the average student
- Over 90% of professors think they are better than average teachers
- Over 90% of drivers think they are safer than the average driver
It is statistically impossible for most of us to be above average, but it speaks to the psyche in all of us. Assuming we know better than most is both logically and mathematically untrue. Believing in that assumption casts a perilous shadow, often riddled with unrealized bias and hubris, over how we present ourselves and treat others.
Besides, why is it important at all to be above average? What are the worst things that could happen if I'm below average?
- I'd be working harder to get better
- I'd be more aware of my ego and biases
- I'd be more humble and receptive towards differing opinions
That doesn't sound so bad at all.
Mathematically, it's most likely a coin toss whether I'm above or below average. Assuming the latter seems to bring far more wonder and curiosity than the former, so perhaps it's better to be below average.
Mar 29, 2026